Monthly Book-Ins by Agency

CBP vs ICE — Book-Ins per Month
CBP
ICE

Segregation Placements by Month — Public vs Private Facilities

Monthly Segregation Placements
Public Facilities
Private Facilities

Positive Fear Determination — Avg Days Still in Custody

Single Adults w/ Positive Fear Determination Still Detained — Current vs Prior FY (Avg Days)

Detained Population by State — Top 10

Total Detained Population by State
Criminal Record
No Criminal Record

Monthly Book-Ins — Current vs Prior FY

CBP CBP
ICE ICE

Book-Ins Table

Agency Month Count

Criminality — Average Daily Population Over Time

CBP CBP
ICE ICE

Criminality of Population by State

State Male — Criminal Record Male — No Criminal Record Female — Criminal Record Female — No Criminal Record Total w/ Criminal Record Total w/o Criminal Record Total Population % w/ Criminal Record Split

Facility Data

increase   decrease   since previous dataset — hover for exact change
Facility City State ALOS (days) Male — Criminal Record Male — No Criminal Record Female — Criminal Record Female — No Criminal Record Total Pop.

Alternatives to Detention (ATD) — FY24 / FY25 / FY26

ATD Active Population by FY
Avg Length in ATD Program (Days)

ATD Supervision Technology Mix

ATD Participants by Technology — FY24 / FY25 / FY26

Bond Statistics — Multi-Year Trend

Average Length of Stay (Days) — Monthly
Bond Rate (% of Book-Outs Released on Bond) — Monthly
Average Bond Amount ($) — Monthly

Statistical Analysis

Who Is Being Detained — A Statistically Significant Shift

A chi-square test on ICE Average Daily Population data across FY2024, FY2025, and FY2026 reveals a statistically significant change in the composition of who is being detained (χ² = 227.62, df = 2, p < 0.0001).

36.8%
FY2024
No criminal record
41.6%
FY2025
No criminal record
40.8%
FY2026 YTD
No criminal record

In FY2024, approximately 1 in 3 people in ICE custody had no criminal record. By FY2025 and FY2026, that figure had grown to closer to 2 in 5 — a shift of +4.1 percentage points over two years. The effect size is small (Cramér's V = 0.04), reflecting that the proportional change is modest, but the statistical significance is robust given the large population sizes involved.

Chi-square test on ICE ADP fy_overall figures · FY24: n=37,745 · FY25: n=46,056 · FY26: n=56,434 · All figures sourced directly from ICE Detention Management Statistics